
Hmmmmmmmmm.
Reading this novel is a departure from the strung-out intensity and unravelling tension of the previous two Alvtegen novels that I've read and reviewed on this blog. The skilled buildup of tension has been replaced by an elaborately over-complex psychological plot. This is fine for a novel in general, but problematic for crime fiction.
It's nowhere near as scary. I don't think I've become inured to such scenarios. Far from it. I just don't think it's quite as satisfying. At least, I wasn't that scared. And I usually am by Alvtegen. More than half the' fun' of reading crime fiction is the invocation of horror through the power of language. This time,small bumps in the night and the sudden still watchful alertness of two small dogs, didn't phase me at all.
Karin Alvtegen constructs highly original, fascinatingly enthralling plots based on the psychological damage that humans inflict on each other. She seems particularly interested in the damage done to emerging young psyches and in following the destructive paths these damaged young individuals wreak as they stumble throughout their own adult lives. Obviously Swedish society is a veritable minefield of plots and themes for her. Not that Australian society couldn't replicate them and add a few more twists in for good measure.
In this novel a very small boy is abandoned at the fair and it is a long, long time before we find his mother.
I can only guess that this little boy, in the cover photograph of the small boy with the angst-ridden face on my copy of 'The Text Publishing Company' 2009 edition of the novel, is either a particularly good young actor, or was having a very sad existential moment in the photographic snapshot of reality.It is a particularly poignant shot, and whilst the predicament of the little boy is pivotal to the plot, it is almost a subplot, in the wider context of the novel.
This plot was original, and extremely complex. Exceedingly so I suspect. At one point as I held the book in my hands I realised that I was almost halfway through, page 136 in fact, and there hadn't been any thing odd to remark on other than the dysfunctional marital affairs of a couple of married couples, and the tragic collateral damage that they can inflict on tiny human beings.
This expectation of 'something', some obvious crime, a plot development consistent within the genre of psychological crime fiction, is the expectation that wasn't met. After all, this is genre fiction. Our expectations of the genre are that it should be fresh and original whilst still having recognisable generic boundaries and sign posts. This is why we gravitate to genre fiction.
With writers such as Ruth Rendell, whom Alvtegen has been compared to, I expect a 'why-done-it'. The body or the crime, and often the identified perpetrator, usually appear early on, and the rest of the novel explores why. You know what is going to happen. And often, the suspense almost kills you.
I suspect the problem I've identified for myself is that Alvtegen diverged too much away from the generic parameters of crime fiction in this novel.
This sluggishness of the plot has been remarked on by others, who are obviously kinder in their reviews judging by Alvtegen's website. I suspect that the novel contains structural problems related to the intricate complexities of the subplots. There is literally too much going on and whilst all plot threads reduce in the end, the discovery of a body is almost an anti-climax.
There are too many characters with too many problems. In the previous two Alvtegen novels I've read, the main focus is on one or two characters. In this novel it's hard to keep up with who owns which problem. There is emotional damage and destruction everywhere!
This lack of clear focus also seems to be the reason that there is no sense of personal restorative justice and realignment of psyches in the end, something that I was grateful for in the other two novels where Alvtegen provided a reassurance that wounds could heal. A happy ending of sorts.
There are three endings, all outlined in their own chapters. This should be a clue to the structural problems and lack of textural integrity, if nothing else.
- Chapter 32. There's another death. A certain amount of textual integrity here in that this death is poetically linked to the much older one.
- Chapter 33. There's an indication in that the reading of a personal journal by a stranger will reveal a gross injustice that won't be able to be covered up. So society will achieve justice even if the individuals involved won't.
- Chapter 34. Here, the death of the author is no big deal. Who cares?! ?
There is some attempt at structural integrity in the conclusion. The final image the reader is left with is of an overly sentimental bucolic scene where a
little boy plays. It's not the same little boy we meet in the first
chapter who's anxiously waiting for his mummy. This little boy is entirely responsible for the first little boy's predicament. But too much has happened for us to feel the true impact.
Five (?) of the characters are authors of varying degrees of public success and this allows Alvtegen much scope for exploring the world of words, a self-referential theme that is perhaps a little distracting given that the world of book publishing in this novel seems far too depressingly dismal. Authors experience writer's block and the rounds of book talks become boringly the same.
Sooooooo, perhaps this novel represents a departure for Alvtegen from a point where she has faith that society can heal itself through the healing of individual psyches, to one where she merely hopes that perhaps justice will prevail in society in a very generalised sense.
Perhaps the world is getting bleaker for Alvtegen?
Nevertheless, I'll look forward to her next novel because this gal can write! Just like her great aunt, the creator of Pippi Longstocking.
Recent Comments